Argion
Prove it still works.Every build.
Agents that drive your software through its own interface, the way your people do, and report the moment it stops behaving.
- CLASS
- Software assurance
- SURFACE
- Any reachable interface
- EXECUTION
- Parallel matrix, every build
- OUTPUT
- Replayable evidence
Origin ward
Destination ward
Reason
48 controls · 11 states · 0 test identifiers required
Confirm moved from the dialog footer to the header · route re-resolved, journey completed, change reported
The release is signed offby a suite nobody trusts.
Interface tests break constantly for reasons unconnected to behaviour, so a red build is assumed to be the test's fault and gets muted. At that point the suite has stopped being evidence, and the only thing standing between a change and an operator is somebody's memory.
Explore
Map the application
Agents drive the software through its interface and record what is reachable: every screen, every control, every state a control can put the application into. No instrumentation, no test identifiers sprayed through the source, no access to the repository required. If a person can get there, Argion finds it.
The view at the top of this page follows this list. Selecting a part changes what the interface is showing.
Recorded against a live enterprise application. Every screen in the film is the software under test, driven by Argion through the same interface a person uses.
Interface tests are written against the structure of a page, so they break whenever that structure changes — which is to say constantly, and almost never for a reason connected to whether the software works. The cost is not the failure. It is what the failure teaches the team: that a red build is probably the test's fault. Once that is believed, the suite has stopped being evidence of anything.
Argion resolves every step against a live model of the application rather than against a stored path. When a control moves, is renamed, or is replaced by one that does the same job, the journey still completes and the change is reported as a change. When the behaviour genuinely breaks, the suite says so, and is believed.
Line coverage measures how much of the source was executed. It cannot tell you whether a person can still complete the one task the system exists to allow. In a regulated or safety-critical setting that distinction is the entire argument, and it is the one a coverage number is structurally unable to make.
Argion reports against journeys: which of the paths that matter completed, which degraded, which broke, and on which surfaces. That is a statement an operations lead, a safety case author or an auditor can act on, and it is produced on every build rather than assembled in the fortnight before a review.
- 01Drives real interfaces: no test identifiers, no instrumentation, no source access required
- 02Live application model, so journeys survive redesigns instead of breaking on them
- 03Tests authored in the language of the work, readable by the people who own it
- 04Parallel matrix execution across browsers, viewports, locales and user roles
- 05Replayable evidence for every run, with the minimal difference isolated
- 06Visual, accessibility and state regressions reported alongside functional ones
- 07Runs in CI, on-premise, or fully air-gapped against an internal build
Argion attaches to a pipeline as a stage and to an environment as a user. It needs a reachable build and a set of credentials, not a rewrite: web applications, internal tools, operator consoles and vendor software the organisation did not write and cannot modify are all in scope.
Results publish back as checks on a pull request, as a gate in a release pipeline, or as a signed report against a named build, for the cases where a person has to put their name on it.
Tell us the decision that is going wrong.
Not the roadmap. Not the stack. The call. We answer within 24 hours, including when the answer is that this is not our work.
hello@rynth.ai